Road steepness is expressed as a percentage on UK road signs: what does it mean, and where do the numbers come from?
Have you ever wondered what the percentages mean in those road signs about an upcoming gradient change? I know I have! Here is what I discovered...
20% gradient sign By the B836 road at the top of the hill west of Loch Striven. © Copyright Thomas Nugent and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence. |
You might have some guesses about what the percentages mean. Do they mean...
a) the percentage change of the gradient?
b) the percentage of an angle?
c) something to do with how you should adjust your speed?
or
d) none of the above.
Did you pick d? Of course you did! Correct!
In order to understand their origin, we must first travel back to the mid- 1970s when the gradient signs showed not percentages but ratios! Apparently some of these old signs still exist and I would love to find them. The signs would say 1:3, for example. This meant that for every 3 units travelled horizontally, there would be a 1 unit vertical increase/decrease. It’s irrelevant what unit you’re using (metres, feet, etc) because it’s the ratio that’s important.
An old-style gradient sign on the Bishop's Road near Downhill, Northern Ireland. Albert Bridge / CC BY-SA |
So far, so easy. The problem is this: the ratio 1:5 (a change of 1 unit vertically for every 5 units travelled horizontally) is a steeper gradient than the ratio 1:10 (1 vertical for every 10 horizontal) and that’s actually quite confusing for some people. Surely bigger number ⟹ more steep? Add that most people are viewing these signs in a split-second while driving a vehicle at speed and you’ve got an even bigger problem. A road sign needs to clearly and instantly communicate a warning and the ratio form of the sign simply doesn’t do that: It’s confusing! And so, the powers that be converted the ratio signs into percentage signs. A bigger percentage means a bigger steepness and that’s straightforward for people to grasp. 20% uphill? I’d better change down a gear or two! 5% downhill? Time to ready my brakes!
But I haven’t actually answered the question I posed...what do the percentages actually mean? Well, they are derived from the original ratios. 1:5 means that the vertical change is one fifth of the horizontal change...or 20%! (so the two examples in the photographs above show the same gradients). 1:10 would become 10%, 1:4 would be 25%
Put generally, if the sign says "𝓍%" it means that the vertical change is 𝓍% of the horizontal change: a bigger percentage translates as a steeper hill. If a sign said 50%, it means the vertical change is only half the horizontal change - that’s steep! Not for the faint-hearted!
While the percentages seem a bit nonsensical at first, they are actually rooted in proper maths. It’s just a way of turning something potentially confusing to some into a system that's a bit more intuitive (a road sign absolutely must be easy to understand!)
Bonus maths!
Have you ever wondered what angle the percentages correspond to? Well now you know what they mean, you can use some simple trigonometry to calculate this!
Trig Gradient TOA by T.Briggs is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Compare this to calculating the gradient of a straight line, as would be taught in a maths class ("rise over run" or "change in 𝓎 divided by change in 𝓍"). A good answer for when a student asks when they might need trig in real life, maybe? The angle can be calculated by doing inverse tan of the vertical change divided by the horizontal change.
Some examples, with all angles correct to 3sf:
5% is 2.86°10% is 5.71°20% is 11.3°25% is 14.0°
And so on... (100% would be 45 degrees because tan(45°) = 1)
Some people responding to the original thread pointed out that in the actual maths the gradient would be most likely calculated by comparing the change in elevation with the actual length of the road travelled, in which case we get:
Trig Gradient SOH by T.Briggs is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Simon signed off with:
I hope this has enlightened you in some way! Perhaps it’ll make you a safer driver or maybe cause some accidents because you’ll be distracted while driving. I take no responsibility, I’m just happy to spread knowledge!
It certainly enlightened me! Here's the tweet that kicked off the thread (click through to see the whole thing):
Have you ever wondered what the percentages mean in those road signs about an upcoming gradient change? I know I have! Maths teachers, here is what I discovered... #mathschat @standupmaths pic.twitter.com/Jkq2EkJNf1
— Simon Young (@MrYoungMaths) July 11, 2020
Well, thank you for explaining that, although I have to disagree that this is any more intuitive for Joe public. I have always thought "10% of what?" - how am I supposed to make of judgement of the steepness of the hill I am about to encounter without having your explanation in advance? Whereas I in 10 is something one can automatically envisage, even now armed with your explanation I will have to go through the mental process of converting to 20% to 1in 5! I assumed we were required to make the change by the EU/EEC, if this was decided by someone Whitehall they should be...
ReplyDeleteIf you don't find percentages intuitive, you could try thinking of it like this: -
DeleteFor every 100 units you travel ina horizontal direction, you drop the percentage units down.
For example if a gradient is 20%, for every 100 feet you travel horizontally, you drop 20 feet vertically.
Thanks for the explanation. I pretty much knew everything that you explained. What I didn't know is whether the percentage, or ratio should be: -
ReplyDelete• the tangent of the angle, opposite divided by adjacent (O ÷ a or ᴼ/ₐ)
- or -
• the sine of the angle, opposite divided by hypotenuse (O ÷ h or ᴼ/ₕ)
...and I still don't know
It's a shame it's calculated this way. 1 in 4 should be 20%; 1 in 10 should be 9%. This gives you specific information about the effort required - 20% of vehicle load will be pulling back on the 1 in 4 slope. Ultimately, 100% would mean that the entire weight of your car would need to be overcome in order to climb it. 1 in 4 converting to 25% is more or less useless; we might as well give slopes letters A, B, C etc. Or just "Steep", "Very Steep", "I kid you not, this is practically a cliff" and so on.
ReplyDeleteWhy don’t we just use degrees!
ReplyDelete